Path: frog!cybvax0!mit-eddie!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!decvax!cwruecmp!hal!ncoast!smith
From: smith@ncoast.UUCP (Phil Smith)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: A Day in the Life of Bonehead
Message-ID: <3630@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: 26 Jul 87 20:35
References: <432@pembina.UUCP>
Reply-To: smith@ncoast.UUCP (Phil Smith)
Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh
Lines: 28

> Article <432@pembina.UUCP> From: tim@alberta.UUCP (The Bonehead)
> 
> 
>   x.  we are also running out of the letter 'r' so, for
>       instance, we might not have enough for the rest of this
>       article.
> 
>   w.  bonehead does things as he sees fit, even if they awe (we awe
>       using the lettew 'w' instead of the one we wan out of)
>       totally bad but not, fow instance, illegal.
> 
>   since we fowgot by accident the west of the safety wules, this is
>   all we have to say, so fow instance, good bye.
> -- 
> 
> Copyright 1985 The Bonehead.  All rights reserved.
      ^                             ^      ^

A very clear violation of the rules, he claims to have run
out of a letter then uses it again in his .signature.

Bonehead WE accuse you of the heinous crime of 'selective letter saving'

-- 
		      decvax!cwruecmp!ncoast!smith
		    ncoast is dead, long live ncoast!
			ncoast!smith@case.csnet 
		(ncoast!smith%case.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA)


Path: frog!cybvax0!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!reed!mojo
From: mojo@reed.UUCP (Soon to be a Major Motion Picture)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: A Day in the Life of Bonehead
Message-ID: <6728@reed.UUCP>
Date: 28 Jul 87 19:57
References: <432@pembina.UUCP> <3630@ncoast.UUCP>
Reply-To: mojo@reed.UUCP (Soon to be a Major Motion Picture)
Organization: There is none.  We are drifting in blind orbits, helpless.
Lines: 38

In article <3630@ncoast.UUCP> smith@ncoast.UUCP (Phil Smith) writes:
}> Article <432@pembina.UUCP> From: tim@alberta.UUCP (The Bonehead)
}> 
}> 
}>   x.  we are also running out of the letter 'r' so, for
}>       instance, we might not have enough for the rest of this
}>       article.
}> 
}>   w.  bonehead does things as he sees fit, even if they awe (we awe
}>       using the lettew 'w' instead of the one we wan out of)
}>       totally bad but not, fow instance, illegal.
}> 
}>   since we fowgot by accident the west of the safety wules, this is
}>   all we have to say, so fow instance, good bye.
}> -- 
}> 
}> Copyright 1985 The Bonehead.  All rights reserved.
}      ^                             ^      ^
}
}A very clear violation of the rules, he claims to have run
}out of a letter then uses it again in his .signature.
}
}Bonehead WE accuse you of the heinous crime of 'selective letter saving'
}
}-- 
}		      decvax!cwruecmp!ncoast!smith
}		    ncoast is dead, long live ncoast!
}			ncoast!smith@case.csnet 
}		(ncoast!smith%case.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA)

Don't be silly.  Obvioulsy Bonehead's .signature has a direct line to the
bit bucket, recycling old and unwanted letters.  It lowers the quality of
the file but is generally better than substituting.

*I* beat the line checker.

	"I didn't know pigs could swim!"
	Porkypine


Path: frog!cybvax0!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!alberta!bjorn
From: bjorn@alberta.UUCP (James Bhong)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: A Day in the Life of Bonehead
Message-ID: <450@pembina.UUCP>
Date: 29 Jul 87 17:47
References: <432@pembina.UUCP> <3630@ncoast.UUCP> <6728@reed.UUCP>
Organization: KT Alive Daylight Organonization
Lines: 26

In article <6728@reed.UUCP>, mojo@reed.UUCP (Soon to be a Major Motion Picture) writes:
rIn article <3630@ncoast.UUCP> smith@ncoast.UUCP (Phil Smith) writes:
r}> Article <432@pembina.UUCP> From: tim@alberta.UUCP (The Bonehead)
r}>   since we fowgot by accident the west of the safety wules, this is
r}>   all we have to say, so fow instance, good bye.
r}> 
r}> Copyright 1985 The Bonehead.  All rights reserved.
r}      ^                             ^      ^
r}
r}A very clear violation of the rules, he claims to have run
r}out of a letter then uses it again in his .signature.
r}
r}Bonehead WE accuse you of the heinous crime of 'selective letter saving'
rDon't be silly.  Obvioulsy Bonehead's .signature has a direct line to the
rbit bucket, recycling old and unwanted letters.  It lowers the quality of
rthe file but is generally better than substituting.

You are both wrong, while I and The Bonehead are both right!!!
The fact of the matter is that I supplied those particular r's
direct to The Bonehead in exchange fow a Tiny Bweakfast (M).

As a wesult I may not have enough w's myself to finish this
posting.

		Bhong's my name!!
		and a good bhong to you two.